YodaMan 3D
-
Posts
1,094 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Posts posted by YodaMan 3D
-
-
I would probably play Undead Nightmare online (only if it was like the original), but would want it on different servers then the regular. Which is probably asking a bit much.
-
On 11/14/2017 at 10:49 PM, DarkShark said:
I wouldn't mind them doing it again but I would rather they do something else. Maybe instead of zombies they dabble in some like old indian tales or something. I don't mind the zombie thing now and then but it has been overkill since they released RDR with other games.
But imho, no one has done it better or as well. I like SoD games, but even those don't compare to me.
-
YodaMan 3D = XBOX
-
21 minutes ago, Benjo said:
That's basically it. It's not really a question of "Why didn't John talk about Arthur in RDR1", it's more a question of "How are R$ going to explain the fact John didn't talk about Arthur in RDR1".
Well, that is easy enough. Marston is a man and real man back then just didn't talk about their feelings, especially when it came down to other men.
-
18 minutes ago, Benjo said:
Other people talking about this.
Cause they hadn't created him yet.
-
1
-
-
We need to remember that Ross, really wanted everyone dead in RDR, and I think it goes way beyond him looking out for his career. I think the gang embarrasses him badly and he wants them all dead. Though this is predictable, it doesn't say how it happens. Does Ross do it himself.? Does he make John do it? Does he put Arthur in a bad situation that gets him killed by someone else in the gang?
-
I would think this would become a great idea. Horse racing. Liar's Dice. Poker. There could be lots' of side stuff that could be carried over from RDR, that could entertain in RDR2.
-
12 minutes ago, RON said:
Realistically, the game didn't need that. It was a pain in the arse to actually tame a horse. If it was a good one, it was even harder. Then what? Turn around and sell it? I would rather just pick some flowers lol
It was part of the game though. Why? To me the game should have had it. I see no reason not to. I have been hunting a lot in RDR and you see horses almost everywhere. Considering how important horses were to that time. I would think that would have been better then picking flowers.
-
1
-
-
Not catching them wild and selling them though.
-
On 8/2/2018 at 5:41 AM, Mattdrenaline said:
That's true there's no PVP skill in the game anymore. And you're absolutely right it's like an open world battlefield. Nothing is balanced. It caters too much to noobs. RDR is different and the PVP was so skill based atleast in Auto aim so I just don't see how they will expect people to have near as much fun unless they add all the crazy stuff they have in GTA. Majority are noobs
Majority of that crazy stuff to make the game fun, is usually only fun when used against another player. Many times it is griefing.
-
So replaying RDR, some things that I started to question. Horses in RDR, you can go out on the range and catch a horse and break them. It was nice to upgrade your horse, but then what? The McFarlines teach you how to, you do it for a side mission with Uncle at the end. Why couldn't you do it to make money during the game?
On occasions, you could ride by a gang hideout and get shot at by the locals of that hideout. Why couldn't you hogtie them and take them into the law. Would that add to the bounty hunter theme?
-
So this last weekend, I broke down and got the revolver and hand axe. Seeing how I don't play it much, just every now and again. I started to play around to see everything that has been added. I just hope they put that much effort into RDR, cause I was able to actually play on a public server without any issues and their was a ton to do.
-
On 6/18/2018 at 2:29 AM, Benjo said:
Can I just point out here that Arthur wears a brown hat
That could mean 2 things. 1) It could represent him being in limbo, undecided between good or evil. Undecided, leaving it upto the player to choose his destiny. 2) Or it could really mean nothing than the creators liked cowboys in brown hats.
-
On 8/9/2018 at 12:05 PM, Benjo said:
Not one shot from first person view. Reason to think it's not in? I loved the thought of riding a horse in first person and would be disappointed if it's not in there. Anyone heard anything about this?
I'm not a FPS fan, so this doesn't help me. Yet I do know many that prefer it. So if you have the option, I could see where it would improve sales.
-
I see Ross catch Arthur and convinces him to turn over the gang. Instead Arthur, goes and gives his gang a warning about Ross. Ross being the lying 2 face that he is. Has Arthur followed to where Dutch's gang is residing at. There is a massacre, Arthur is given a choice to flee with his lady friend and make a honest woman of her or die defending his friends to the end. Well John takes his family and Uncle to Blackwater, where they purchase Beechers Hope and retires from the criminal lifestyle tries to settle down. Bill has friends in Armadillo, so heads there and meets a gang that needs an extra gun and makes friends fast. Javier has family in Mexico, where he is welcomed with open arms, seeing how his second cousin twice removed has big plans, one Colonel Agustin Allende. Meanwhile, Dutch seeing his gang get decimated and feeling this betrayal was caused by one he called a friend. Sneaks off during the battle leaving to go and hide in the mountains where he meets others like himself and seeking a charismatic leader that feels hatred by the ways of humanity. Meanwhile, Arthur being controlled by you is given a few options. You can A) grab you lady love by the hand, offer to make a honest woman out of her, then lead her to safety. Hoping that with all of the bodies yours won't be missed. B) refuse to allow Ross to harm anyone, take up arms and lead an attack at Ross and his cronies, where you get (que that Bon Jovi song, "Blaze of Glory") where you get shot down in the blaze of glory defending your friends in hopes that they will join you and make a last stand. Never living long enough to realize they ran instead of fighting with you. C) Being shot in the back by Dutch, when he discovers you lead the law to his front door, you idiot. D) Last but not least, you arrive at camp. Ross congratulates you on helping him bring them all to justice, forcing your friends to believe that you betrayed them. Which causes a firefight when Ross shoots you in the back. He can't share this glorious moment in his career with anyone. Especially a dirty rotten outlaw such as yourself.
-
On 8/9/2018 at 7:36 PM, GatoNegro said:
The only thing that should ever be prevented entirely is hackers or anyone trying to cheat the game. If someone wants to sit around and hide and they enjoy playing a game like that, that is fine with me.
So if another player, who only has fun by griefing others, finds a strategic place and snipes you every time you spawn in and is willing to do that for hours, to the point where you won't enjoy the game at all. You are ok with that and will entertain them, cause that is ok?
-
On 1/9/2018 at 7:12 PM, DiamondDave said:
This I would probably enjoy but not for the main bit of the game. Rockstar is known for solo campaigns and I don't want that to change.
They was known for solo campaigns till GTA5 came along. Then they was known for their online game. They could always add a co-op to a solo campaign options. GoW did it for their games and it worked well.
-
GoW series had co-op campaigns. I personally like co-op campaigns. Wish more games had them. In RDR, I liked the PvP cause it was funny riding with others and taking on the PvE hideouts till other players would show up and PvP or in some cases join in and help you. That was fun back then.
-
On 8/10/2018 at 4:27 PM, Freddie Mercury said:
I didn't like the way Rockstar handled GTA 5's single player, once you completed the all the main missions and Stranger and Freaks missions. There was really nothing left to do, it was a beautiful open world that lacked any depth imo. Which is why I'm hoping we get some single player dlc this time around.
I was thinking another undead nightmare expansion? Or maybe some Aliens and Cowboy type of stuff?
Would be a nice change up, Didn't enjoy the online expansions we got with GTA 5.
Do you mean RDR? GTA5 there was so much extra, I still have done it all.
-
On 8/10/2018 at 4:27 PM, Freddie Mercury said:
I didn't like the way Rockstar handled GTA 5's single player, once you completed the all the main missions and Stranger and Freaks missions. There was really nothing left to do, it was a beautiful open world that lacked any depth imo. Which is why I'm hoping we get some single player dlc this time around.
I was thinking another undead nightmare expansion? Or maybe some Aliens and Cowboy type of stuff?
Would be a nice change up, Didn't enjoy the online expansions we got with GTA 5.
GTA5 rumors was that they did have campaing dlcs. They scrapped them to focus on PvP, thinking that was where the money was at. Looking back now, I still think they could have released them, but they may of needed the man power somewhere else and didn't think PvE players needed the attention.
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, Benjo said:
I've done some more thinking on this. It's been a while since I played RDR1 storymode but doesn't it start with John at Bonnie's ranch immediately after the "left for dead" event?
My guess would be that RDR2 story will lead up to that and include it, so continuing to play as John wouldn't make sense, as that would take you straight into RDR1's storyline.
Not necessarily, it may lead upto the point where John gets his ranch, tries to start a life with his family, and then the law comes and convinces him to aid them in pursuing the old gang.
-
On 8/10/2018 at 9:58 PM, FLIP said:
Do you think there will be more than one ending? I am not sure if they will do that in this game but you could be on to something there. Would make you want to play through the game twice as well to see which other things you can do. I am guessing if you are "too good" then you won't be able to do as many dirty missions.
There was with GTA 5.
-
16 hours ago, Cokeyskunk said:
You bring up a good point.
I realize "respawning" is not a real-world thing, but this game would be boring as funk if it didn't exist in it.
That said, how cool would it be if they made this game to be as real-world as possible?
Like, if you do as you say and acquire a special gun in multiplayer, modify it, add embellishments, etc. -- but if you get killed, you have to re-acquire it. Whether it be to race back to your death site or to get it off the person who picked it up from you. (whether by purchase, by trade, or by force.)
Speaking of which, how cool would it be if we could HOLD-UP other players and rob them??
Man, there could be SO MUCH in this game that could be so cool.
But the @Truth of the matter is -- I'll still love it, regardless.
It would be so cool that I wouldn't play MP. We have talked about gankers and griefers a bit in this forum. This would only fuel those fires.
-
I expect to see far to little, yet enough to drive me crazy waiting for release of the game.
-
1
-
Undead Nightmare 2?
in Red Dead Redemption 2
Posted · Edited by YodaMan 3D
SoD = State of Decay. It is a Microsoft game for PC and Xbox. You have a small community trying to survive a zombie apocalypse. You need supplies and deal with outside communities as well as deal with the endless spawn of zombies that may attack you and your safehouse.
I like the pic too.