bluntTR4P
-
Posts
264 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Posts posted by bluntTR4P
-
-
It has nothing to do with Fluff Cry. That game is entirely different. They likely ran in to some delays with getting the game done. I am going to assume it has to do more so with the online side of the game than the main story. It happens all the time. This is why most creators make games 2 or 3 years in advance. So they can have something to crank out when they wish.
-
I like to rub things in but I realize how stupid it is to be glad I am right in this scenario.
Now I have to wait even longer for the game
-
1
-
-
Ehh. It could. If they had planned on making a PC release version already it is likely half way done if not nearly done so it would be stupid to give it up at this point. Not sure if we will see one or not but if not, I am sure this game may play a slight role in the decision.
-
I don't mean to sound like a douche here OP but this idea does not fit the bill at all. I liked AC, I played them all. There is a reason history briefing works well for those games. They are also heavily based on conspiracies and secret societies. You are not going to see any kind of "freemasonry voodoo" in a Rockstar game unless it was to make fun of it. As for the actual history.. I am done with school. lol
-
25 minutes ago, CowBoii said:
I know so many of us have gone back and forth with this a million times already but I still have a feeling that John will be in the main story line and the guy (William "Bill" Williamson) from the last one will be one of three you can play. There wont really be a villain but we will rather be playing as a fall out. So essentially we will see John turn good and actually become the villain OR we will see him turn away and Bill become to villain. At the beginning you will be playing as the bad guys though.
If you are right, I would be very happy. Everything that has mentioned John Marston being in the main story line though has been rejected.
-
If they have some solid thing you can unlock to further the story, I am all for that. But if it is just achievement hunting I could care a less. I am not someone to play a game till it is 100%. I decide when I am done.
-
On 4/28/2017 at 1:31 AM, Anc1entC0re said:
When it gets released this year, I will be rubbing your green face in it bub
Let us put a wager on that kind sir. They are not a company to remain silent this long unless something is changing.
-
Yup. There are a number of threads on the forum about how we basically all agree on that.
Well aside for @Anc1entC0re which I don't see it happening buddy. Think about it.
-
1
-
-
On 4/17/2017 at 5:42 PM, SNIP3XL said:
Reigns, saddle, horse shoes, skin/fur and eye color... Not really all that much you can do with horses really. Imagine a lot of black/white horses in Online
Well there are a few there but still, nothing compared to what a car has and what can be customized on a car. I don't think they were into braiding their horse's hair or using dye in it back then. lol
-
On 4/17/2017 at 5:58 PM, Glopez said:
I don't know if they would go that far in to things. Looking at GTA V, they had preset items in the home where nothing could be moved but the quality of said home changed depending on what you spent.
They will likely cheap out and give use that but hey, it is a start. Having your own safe space online will be needed lol
-
On 4/17/2017 at 6:05 PM, Glopez said:
I find most people play them and enjoy them because they make the game feel longer. Like if it was just a straight story to the end, the game would likely feel waaay too short ya know?
Yeah I guess. It was never something that I cared about in a game unless I was rewarded with something for the main story line.
-
On 4/18/2017 at 7:07 PM, jACKx said:
I wasn't much a fan of these either. The fast travel was fin but to have to pitch a tend every time was annoying.
I would have been okay with this had he done something different now and then but I guess that is asking for too much back then. Now though... Come on! haha
-
6 minutes ago, shawn said:
They will more than likely release it on PC just for the online. If they have a massive online community like GTA V did and still does, it will be in their interest. Specially if they allow creator mods and stuff which can be loads of fun!
Okay this I can see just for the fact that the online community would thrive being behind creative options but that is a big fat IF... If they decide to have this kind of online play and if they allow the creative options.
-
On 4/19/2017 at 8:12 PM, GatoNegro said:
I agree about it being different today.
There are more PC gamers today than there were just in 2012. Yes, console gaming still leads but that is because of cost and convenience. It takes a lot more money to have a solid gaming PC built than to just buy a console.
That is the thing that makes me think they wont wast the time. Most gaming PC's cost $700+ for a good one. For one that can run games like Witcher, we are talking $1200+ and that is the cheaper end ones. Graphics cards get very pricey!
-
On 4/17/2017 at 5:44 PM, SNIP3XL said:
If they really put some effort into it, then robbing banks in the Wild West would be pretty cool. Would also make a great "job"/way to make money. The good side of it could be acting as the sheriff/town lynch mob going after robbers.
Same with robbing trains etc... man there is so much cool stuff in the Wild West when you think about it! They would all make interesting activities in the game
Exactly! The trains will be a huge bonus. I completely forgot about the train in the first one. DOH! I would be over the moon if they pull something like this off, for real!
-
18 hours ago, FLIP said:
Sounds good to me. I just don't want it to be a mess of people just fighting for no reason. They have to have things established well for this to work.
Yeah I get that. I would like to think they have enough sense in them to not have a system that enables online trolls.
-
Well... If they took too long to release it.. Like if it didn't come out till like 2019+ then I would likely be too pissed off at that point to bother with it. Other than that, the story would have to completely tank it. That is something I would not know unless the game was spoiled for me though.
-
Camp grounds. I don't know why, but I could only watch them so many times. Was it really needed to set up a camp ever time you wanted to travel somewhere!?
-
I was fine with what they had tbh. There doesn't seem to be a need to have THAT many detailed side missions. Most people skip them unless they plan on 100% maxing out the completion.
-
You can only go so far unless they just say f it all and allow you to have the Nyan cat on the side of your horse and glitter shooting out it's butt! LOL
-
1
-
-
So in my randomness thinking, I thought - What if they had jobs players can do to earn money?
Like in GTA, you have the option to rob banks and such. What if you get the option to be "good" or "bad" online in RDR2?
So if you are good, you do "good" jobs like maybe transport items, farming, maybe own a pub/bar?
-
18 hours ago, MajorPain said:
Owning a ranch of some sort is more less a given. I mean look at what you need/can own in GTAO to earn cash, Office, Vehicle Warehouse, Cargo warehouse, other garages, MC business etc. All that kind of stuff is gonna be ported over with Wild West equivalents.
THIS.
If they are going to do it GTA style, they will have to allow places where you can store your horse no matter what.
-
I like the idea of having the option to add details to your home like better quality chairs, beds, ect. I am with you on that. Not sure how many options we can actually have for that cause this isn't like the Sims but I am on board with the idea.
-
1
-
-
On 4/8/2017 at 9:35 PM, ChrisCr0ss said:
That doesn't make sense though. When you have a console game and want to work it into PC format it takes more time. Also, games that sell on Steam for example don't go on sale often and still make sales. Look at Black Ops II. It is still selling on there at full price how many years later?
Yeah but who is dumb enough to buy that? They even just brought it back for Xbox ONE so it is backwards compatible.
The point I was making is that the community itself on the PC side of gaming is not keen on these kinds of games. GTA is different for a lot of reasons.
-
1
-
I'm a little mad...
in Red Dead Redemption 2
Posted
I am with you. I don't mind the delay but why keep us thinking that there was still a chance for a fall release when you know damn well far ahead of time it will be delayed. They likely knew they wouldn't meet the fall goal 3 or 4 months ago but they still let it linger.