.gif.a2c453426a74ec6cd2617ea503372597.gif)
Cokeyskunk
-
Posts
474 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
16
Posts posted by Cokeyskunk
-
-
-
29 minutes ago, CMcC said:
I'll take what I can get. This artwork makes me wonder though if we'll be able to fan the hammer. That would awesome. Looks like maybe some engraving options too?
You bring up a good point.
I realize "respawning" is not a real-world thing, but this game would be boring as funk if it didn't exist in it.
That said, how cool would it be if they made this game to be as real-world as possible?
Like, if you do as you say and acquire a special gun in multiplayer, modify it, add embellishments, etc. -- but if you get killed, you have to re-acquire it. Whether it be to race back to your death site or to get it off the person who picked it up from you. (whether by purchase, by trade, or by force.)
Speaking of which, how cool would it be if we could HOLD-UP other players and rob them??
Man, there could be SO MUCH in this game that could be so cool.
But the @Truth of the matter is -- I'll still love it, regardless.
-
On 8/7/2018 at 3:29 PM, CMcC said:
It’s going to completely blow the original away in every aspect. RDR will always have a place in our hearts but it’ll be small potatoes next to this one. It’ll be like comparing GTA4 to GTA5. ....says me.
I agree. Totally.
. . . but how? ????
-
6 minutes ago, Jackthestripper said:
Sadly for her, no I couldn't afford it. lol I could have sold my Lamborghini or one of my 5 Ferrari's, but decided against it.
I still remember that dude who did the series of "PLEASE Give Me A Million Dollars" videos on YouTube. He kept making them until someone actually did.
-
29 minutes ago, YodaMan 3D said:
Something to do after the main story is complete would be great. As in most Rockstar games, you finish the main story and all of a sudden you have this great big open world with nothing to do but ride around shoot things for no reason. I get it story ends, but doesn't mean Arthur or John had to hang up their guns and waste a way.
I hear you, but that's difficult to do. When the story's over . . . it's over, right? I mean, they let you keep playing so you can get to 100% completion, but once you're there, what more is there to do? They'd have to continually release new side missions to keep you invested. Isn't that time better spent adding more to RDR:O?
All that being said, it WOULD be cool if they did add ONE special FINAL mission which doesn't activate UNLESS you get to 100% in single-player mode. THAT might keep players invested in the game after the story mode is over?
-
1
-
-
24 hours from now.
What are you expecting/hoping/praying to see or not see from it?
-
32 minutes ago, YodaMan 3D said:
Rumor a couple of years ago, was Carl was suppose to step up and take lead.
That would be weird now, wouldn't it? ????
-
13 minutes ago, YodaMan 3D said:
they added easy kill machines like jet fighters and tanks
13 hours ago, Archbell said:decided to include Passive Mode, infinite explosives or a Kill Yourself option
See, it's THESE things right here that will always make me love RDR more that GTA.
- In GTA, they can give you all the above-described garbage to instantly (and repeatedly) destroy/murder/blow-up enormous groups of people.
- In RDR, what do you get? A horse, ancient guns, and a stick of dynamite.
Of course, I realize that doesn't negate the possibility of causing an enormous explosion in RDR (a la Guy Fawkes' method for Parliament. "Remember, remember . . . ")
But if one WERE to do that, they'd have to stockpile TONS of gunpowder in one place, then attract a large group there and detonate it.
Want to do that? Fine! BOOM! Wow, you got us! That would be kinda cool, actually! Wouldn't make me mad.
My point is: they COULD do it -- but with tremendous effort and committed time.
Not, "Imma blow ya up, and when you respawn, Imma just blow ya up again."
This is why RDR will always be a superior game to me.
-
1 minute ago, YodaMan 3D said:
Well, they didn't contain them in GTA:O, you had to do work a rounds to avoid them.
I did try GTA:O shortly after I completed the single-player mode. I kept getting murdered within two minutes of playing. I just didn't have the time to invest in learning how to stay alive. (I figured I'd have to fight constantly to do it) so, I just gave up after a while.
-
14 hours ago, lonestar said:
Maybe 2028. 2023 is only 5 years away (OMG I feel old) and GTA 5 for example is still going very strong after that amount of time.
Well, I did say "usual". I'm very much hoping this game, like GTA V, is an exception!
-
27 minutes ago, Archbell said:
Yeah but we only see Jack up until 1914 when he is around 18 - 19 years old.
Eh, close enough to his 20's.
-
1 minute ago, Truth said:
Ran out...
-
20 minutes ago, Jackthestripper said:
I agree. I think your life has to be pretty dull to be obsessed over some celebrity who probably doesn't even care you exist. Everyone kisses their ass because they are celebrities. At the end of the day, like you said, they are just normal people, and a lot of them are probably very depressed behind all that money. I'm not saying I wouldn't mind having some extra money, I mean I DO play the Powerball for a reason....however it wouldn't make me any better than a bum on the street if I won. It's just money.
You mean you DIDN'T donate toward the extra $100 million to make poor Kylie Jenner the world's youngest "self-made" BILLIONAIRE?
????
Sorry. "Hey, give me money so I can be a billionaire" does NOT equate to being "self-made" in my book.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Truth said:
I'll stop ranting about nothing important now that my lunch break is over lol
Well, if you're bored, you can spend the rest of your free time liking all my posts. ????
-
2
-
-
5 minutes ago, Kean_1 said:
Of course I did. ......but I didn't want to give it away.
Men WIthout Hats ...."You can dance if you want to...."
I graduated highschool in the mid eighties so yeah, I know the references well.
Oh good! I graduated in the mid-nineties, so I was afraid I might be the only Gen-X'er here. High five, brother! ????
7 hours ago, YodaMan 3D said:I read some where if it happens you have go get your hat or you can lose it. To replace it you have to go buy a new one. If true, I am sure I see lots of characters running around without hats.
If this is the case, I REALLY hope it takes a lot to knock that friggin' hat off. Like, it better not fly off just by running fast on a horse. Otherwise, all my in-game budget is going to go toward buying #&@%ing hats.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Suck3rPunch3d said:
I am guilty of being a troll myself but I keep it short and usually only with people I know. I don't screw with randoms. The worst thing about some of these trolls is that they have YouTube channels showcasing it which only further encourages the behavior, especially with kids and teens which tends to be the most annoying group of trolls there is.
I don't really consider it "trolling" if you're momentarily giving some buddies a hard time. Now, if you ALWAYS give them a hard time NON-STOP, that's a little different. But yes, I usually equate "trolling" to randoms. But if you're constantly targeting certain people, I guess that could be trolling.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Suck3rPunch3d said:
Not banned, suspended. But they would have to be smart about it. I get what you are saying. It is like a double-edged sword. Trolls can easily abuse this too.
Your eyes are opened. You now can see. ????
Trolls can be relentless. They are the cancer of the gaming world.
I think trolls should be hunted down by a posse IRL.
-
2
-
-
Yes, I know much will be speculation, but what NEEDS to be in this game to make it better than its predecessor?
-
11 minutes ago, Suck3rPunch3d said:
That is just trolling. You know most people doing this are doing it because they find it funny. They want to get people to rage quit. They need to have some kind of report system where if the person gets reported on for the same thing so many times, in a short amount of time, and by multiple people, they should be suspended for it.
Ahh, but if a group of trolls decide to troll YOU and all report you together, wouldn't that get you banned for nothing?
-
10 minutes ago, Suck3rPunch3d said:
That pissed me off when they removed that from Friday the 13th. Things like this in general just ruin online gaming for everyone else. They constantly have to change things to keep people happy because groups of morons like to suck the fun out of it for everyone else.
I just hope whatever they do with RDR2 online, they have it stable to handle players like this without punishing everyone else.
Rockstar's pretty good at keeping their game well-run. I'll be interested to see how they combat trolls in this game.
2 hours ago, Truth said:I sure hope so, that's pretty shitty... Gamers these days are so damn selfish...
I have no issue with screwing over your competition, but screwing over a teammate like that only gives your opponent a chance to steal the win. People like that shouldn't be allowed to play games online...
GO GET 'EM, @Truth!!! ????
-
2
-
1
-
-
44 minutes ago, Kean_1 said:
Ahhhhh..... The 80s.
Yes, but did you get the reference??
(HINT: Google "Safety Dance") ????
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Truth said:
In Friday the 13th, we used to have teamkilling. It really made the game more interesting. Trying to save someone also meant you risked killing them accidentally, making things more realistic. Unfortunately it was abused, so they removed it. They literally said "we can't have nice things". This was a great feature that made things more interesting, but we have too many trolls these days that can't play nice with others.
Yep. When I started playing F13, you had to be DAMN careful when lashing out at Jason after he grabbed another counselor. And you COULDN'T blast him with the shotgun 'cause that almost guaranteed death for your co-player. It added a creepy dynamic to the game.
Then -- as time went by, you'd start a game and see two players armed with pre-spawned baseball bats SPRINTING toward you, yelling "YOU BETTA RUN!! YOU BETTA RUN, B!%@#!!!"
So then, we had to get away from Jason AND troll counselors!
Jerks . . .
-
1
-
1
-
-
26 minutes ago, Benjo said:
I can't stop watching the little mouth he blows through on that gif
That's hilarious. Didn't notice it, and now that's all I can see!
Upon further research, it appears that Jack Marston was actually born in the very same year as Shemp Howard.
Kinda makes his cowboy wardrobe all the more goofy, doesn't it?
-
So, I used to love to play the multiplayer game modes.
But one thing on one of the games I remember hating was in "Hold Your Own" - one of my favorites.
I got REALLY good at it - knew where all the best places were to run and hide while advancing toward the bag. Then, after grabbing the bag, I knew how to dodge fire from the other team while running back to my team's chest to drop it off.
What I hated: right when I'd be about to drop the bag off and get the points/credit/money for it -- I'd either see a dynamite stick appear at the chest, which would blow me up right before I got there -- or else I'd get sniped FIVE FEET from the chest.
. . . and BOTH of these were by my OWN TEAM MEMBERS. They'd kill me so THEY could pick up the bag and get the points, then go hide again and do it to the next fella.
Look. I HAVE been known to defend "camping" before, but that's ONLY in a "Shootout" game -- where the only objective is to get as many kills as possible. Sure, camp away. All's fair in love and war. I get it.
But to have your OWN TEAM MEMBERS kill you and steal your hard-earned reward from you. THAT sucked. THAT is "griefing" to me.
One thing I DID love about RDR was the "Vote to Kick" option.
If some jackwagon decided to do that repeatedly, he'd eventually get enough voted to be kicked out of the game.
I have no doubt RDR2 will have similar multiplayer game modes. But will they do anything to keep the garbage described above from happening?
-
1
-
Official: Game Play Trailer Released Aug 9th
in Red Dead Redemption 2
Posted
AHH!! But what if that's Rockstar's great plan for fighting the "gankers and griefers"??
In the real world, 150 years ago, these same types existed! Robbery was rampant. Murder was commonplace. Bandits and gangs ran the show.
(That's what these jerks would be! Outlaw gangs!)
THEN . . .
Justice appeared!
. . . in the form of sheriffs, marshals, and gathered posses!
They'd amass their forces, hunt them down, and either arrest them or execute them.
HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO EXECUTE A TROLL??
Or HEY! What if you could throw them into jail, and they'd INSTANTLY lose all their weapons and much of their money?? (kinda like in GTA) Then, they'd have to start all over again.
That's quite literally "policing" trolls!
I love this . . . #ihopeihopeihope