Does folding reset the 10th Gambler's challenge : Win three hands of Poker in a row

[FOG]

Does folding reset the 10th Gambler's challenge : Win three hands of Poker in a row? I want to know a precise answer, only if you know it first hand or from a real source, not speculation. 

Precisely, Can I : win one hand, fold five hands then win another 1, then fold 3 others then win a final one?

OR must it be 3 consecutive wins, without folding?

Edited October 31, 2018 by FOG

[Poggy]

I don't know, but I would interpret it as three in a row without folds.  Folding is still a lost hand, is it not?

[FOG]

3 hours ago, Poggy said:

I don't know, but I would interpret it as three in a row without folds.  Folding is still a lost hand, is it not?

Sadly this is speculation.

[Poggy]

Yes, sadly it is.  

[Benjo]

This thread is making me quite sad.

[PZA1982]

This is a daft question. Folding=losing. You have made your initial bet, then decided to fold. You have lost. You have not won. Therefore if you fold after winning the previous hand, but then win the next one, you have not won two in a row. You have won two out of three.

[YodaMan 3D]

Soon as you get your cards, go all-in.  The others will fold immediately.  You won't win much, but you get easy wins.

[rick249kdr]

In what world do you interpret "Win 3 hands in a row" as being able to fold?

 

[FOG]

3 hours ago, YodaMan 3D said:

Soon as you get your cards, go all-in.  The others will fold immediately.  You won't win much, but you get easy wins.

Thanks for this useful, positive tip.