What are some things you DON'T want to see?

[bluntTR4P]

In terms of online multiplayer, what are some things you don't want to see?

I know a lot of people had said they don't want something similar to the last game's online as it felt "unfinished". I pretty much don't want to see a copy and past of GTA V. Not that it was bad or anything but I want the game to feel different. Have differences and things that set it apart from GTA V.

[YellowDragon]

I don't want to see bloated servers. I am sure they will do it the right way but sometimes when I would go on a GTA server, the amount of bloat was apparent in the lag. Sticking to the 16 players per server limit sounds like a good idea. 

[LinXX]

16 hours ago, YellowDragon said:

I don't want to see bloated servers. I am sure they will do it the right way but sometimes when I would go on a GTA server, the amount of bloat was apparent in the lag. Sticking to the 16 players per server limit sounds like a good idea. 

If they have HUGE maps like on GTA and manage them better, I don't see why they couldn't allow more than 16. Assuming the map is smaller though, I would say maybe capping it off at 8 would make sure this doesn't become and issue.

[ChrisCr0ss]

I don't want to see massive gains via "pay to win". I know they handled GTA fine but who is to say they don'e muck this one up? I don't mind being able to pay real money for in game stuff but it should not come down to giving people an unfair advantage. 

[Archbell]

As long as they don't make explosives overpowered or include any form of Passive Mode I think I'll greatly enjoy RDR Online.

[GatoNegro]

On 6/6/2017 at 11:17 AM, Archbell said:

As long as they don't make explosives overpowered or include any form of Passive Mode I think I'll greatly enjoy RDR Online.

It doesn't seem like it is in Rockstar's nature to make a passive mode. LOL

Thought, if they do have this option, let it be on separate servers (for wimps) and don't give them the same stuff you can get on the man's server.  

[YellowDragon]

On 6/5/2017 at 4:50 PM, LinXX said:

If they have HUGE maps like on GTA and manage them better, I don't see why they couldn't allow more than 16. Assuming the map is smaller though, I would say maybe capping it off at 8 would make sure this doesn't become and issue.

8 doesn't feel like enough and if the maps are smaller, then 16 would indeed feel like too many. 

[DarkShark]

General glitches and issues like most games back then had. Even the better games all had some spots where your player would get caught up on something. I noticed in RDR that most issues were on the horse and though they were minor, they hopefully have fixed them. 

[Binzee]

I really don't want to see the same community, and as an attachment the same play styles. This isn't really something R* can control but i would find it very disapointing if It is the same younger kids doing the exact same shit just on horses. I'm hoping for more of a "western" playerbase that does things that might seem reasonable, less explosive and random, more methodical, longwinded and detailed.

[LinXX]

On 6/13/2017 at 9:18 PM, Binzee said:

I really don't want to see the same community, and as an attachment the same play styles. This isn't really something R* can control but i would find it very disapointing if It is the same younger kids doing the exact same shit just on horses. I'm hoping for more of a "western" playerbase that does things that might seem reasonable, less explosive and random, more methodical, longwinded and detailed.

That makes sense. I don't think anyone would want to see a bunch of kids killing each other on their horses. If they could find a way to control this and allow there to be things to do outside of mindless game play, I am all for it.

[HIGHHorse]

Passive mode would be stupid. The whole point of playing a game like this online is the risk of being shot. If you go with friends on a server and someone messes with you, well, they will learn their lesson. lol

[jACKx]

On 6/4/2017 at 11:58 PM, bluntTR4P said:

In terms of online multiplayer, what are some things you don't want to see?

I know a lot of people had said they don't want something similar to the last game's online as it felt "unfinished". I pretty much don't want to see a copy and past of GTA V. Not that it was bad or anything but I want the game to feel different. Have differences and things that set it apart from GTA V.

I would guess that in terms of some things online, it will feel copy/paste to some extent though. I am not sure to what extent but eh. So long as they do it the right way, which is the BEST way, I won't care.

[bluntTR4P]

On 6/25/2017 at 7:59 PM, jACKx said:

I would guess that in terms of some things online, it will feel copy/paste to some extent though. I am not sure to what extent but eh. So long as they do it the right way, which is the BEST way, I won't care.

Well we have seen a lot of gaming developers go down the wrong path and never return. They want money and like money so I just can't see them going it again. Though I do agree that there will be some kind of copy and paste to the game as they did see a lot of success with GTA V.