Kean_1

Old Man Jones. He will lower or raise your honor for a price.

I have a feeling once properties are introduced (assuming they are), we might get things like gun cabinets, sleeping/spawn points, etc. I could also see a property box like we have in camps but I think they would still like to keep players limited to what they can store and carry.

Quite refreshing actually. Thanks @Madrigalian.

This community is better than this. Closing this thread as it seems it won't stop if I don't.

No, but then again, I think R* has made it clear that they are not particularly interested in using everything from the GTAO playbook in RDO. I can't imagine these roles would make the game feel more sanitized or diminish player interaction (quite the opposite) but again, we really have no idea what this new mechanic will include so.... Personally, I see it as hopefully a way to give players what they want out of the game. Those that enjoy more risk, engagements with randoms, etc. could have that. ....those that don't, won't.

Good post @Madrigalian..... Reminds me that I still have about 5 treasure maps I need to collect on.

I'm curious to see what the new "role" mechanics bring to the game as well.

Will do.

Hi Milk and welcome to the forums. I don't have an answer to your question but I'm sure someone will. Also, please don't double post. You made a similar thread in the Q&A section of the RDR2 forum which I will let stand. .....I will close this one out instead. Good luck.

IMO, that's generally good news as they don't typically say that unless R* tells them that it's an issue they have acknowledged exists and are working to resolve.

Do you want me to combine it for you? If so, I will.

Fact is, you can't assume someone at R* is monitoring this site and if they are, they will likely never respond directly as that is not how they operate. You need to open a trouble ticket to communicate with them directly. R* doesn't have an official forum and RDR.org is in no way affiliated with them nor 2K.

Folks looking to form or join a posse, please look in the Posse Recruitment subforum: https://www.rdr2.org/forums/forum/16-posse-recruitment/ ....or here: https://www.rdr2.org/forums/clubs/?view=grid&csrfKey=c88e9f2597ff68a856a3fb9808319dd1

I'd like to remind folks to keep their exchanges in this forum civil.

ha ha ha..... Yeah, it's actually a bit of a side story in the game. I never figured out where Gavin was nor do I know how it ends myself (if ever). If folks responding to Alien's question could make sure to leave out spoilers of their own, that would be appreciated. .....unless of course he wishes to know.

No worries. To be honest, the remark is borderline but not aimed at someone here or anyone named and I really didn't pay much mind to it. The only reason I brought any of this up was to clarify the rule when it was questioned by someone else. This has been the 2nd time in the last few days someone challenged it and I just wanted to set the record straight. It's all good.

On PS4 there is also a cloud save for files. Perhaps you can see if a later file is saved when you go to one house or the other and then download it? ....just a thought

Why are you apologizing? You've done nothing wrong. .....quite the opposite as I've stated here several times. This whole debate HuDawg brought up had nothing to do with anything that you did wrong. ....you were actually following the rules. Ok?

C'mon HuDawg.... When you call out a player because of their actions like in C20s example (even made a derogatory remark toward him) , that would be considered naming & shaming and he was right to blur it out as it would have otherwise been deleted and subject to a warning. The whole thread was about players who poach and those that do it. C20 recognized that he would be naming & shaming and kudos to him for respecting the rules by blurring it out. You can't get a more clear cut example of naming & shaming than this. I don't have a problem with someone disagreeing with this rule but I would have a problem if they chose to ignore it because of it. It's not up for debate. In this case, it would have been naming and shaming if the user name was included. .....simple as that.

Continue to report it to R* if you're not already. Provide screenshots and/or video evidence. If you're not satisfied with answers they provide, don't let them close the trouble ticket and try to escalate it. Like Lumper mentioned, not all problems are widespread so there may be other things at work here. Not saying that is isn't an issue, just making sure you are also trying to work the problem with R* as well so they can attempt to resolve it for you.

Thanks for doing that and respecting the rules. No, the above also falls under the naming and shaming rules. Even with evidence that shows someone is trolling, cheating, etc. in the game, we do not allow the naming & shaming or "calling out" of any other players and/or fellow members regardless of the circumstances. We urge folks to use the in-game reporting features and R* Support site to report such activities and to submit their evidence. If a member here is being trolled or harassed in these forums, via PM or otherwise, report the post and/or contact one of us (the staff) so we can handle it. From the bits I saw of the video, that example should be fine as C20 blurred out the offender's name. If anyone has questions about the rules, please ask us.: Name and shame: Please don't be tempted to"name and shame" or call out other players in Red Dead Online that you might have had a dispute or other issue with. We don't allow those sorts of posts.

In the examples given in this thread, that's exactly what they are doing but also reciprocating the attackers action. Just because some people choose dish it back out to griefers doesn't mean they are going to go hunt down innocent players.

I had a member in another thread question why we don't allow naming & shaming within these forums and this is one good example. Plenty of folks play offline for various legitimate reasons including myself. Maybe I just don't want others in my friends list, etc. to know I'm online. Sometimes I just forget. I use my console as my media center and I don't want to be bothered most of the time it's on. A 170 level also proves nothing and quite frankly isn't all that high at this point in the game. .....and there are plenty of griefers out there who are low level.

Well, people who are shot don't tend to get "knocked" around either. I'm not going to provide any links here due to the sensitive nature of the content but I could show you plenty of examples of people being shot. Someone on a horse would likely just "fall off" due to their reaction to being shot (e.g. lose their balance) or simply by being incapacitated where in that case, you'd probably just drop like a sack of potatoes. Being blown back, thrown/knocked around, etc. is mostly just Hollywood dramatics as @The_Liquor mentioned.

I don't recall it was but apparently I'm wrong. I also didn't play RDR1 online.